Thursday, June 13, 2013

glover's mistake. nick laird.


i found "glover's mistake" at the san juan capistrano library.  the cover caught my eye, loved the sea foam green and the illustrations.  and of course, the chicago tribune's praise had me excited to read it. the tribune claimed that it was "the kind of book jane austen would've written if she'd been male and hipper---and had internet access."  sounds amazing right?  but it wasn't.

i ran into the same problem that i had with "wuthering heights", i didn't like any of the characters.  perhaps a better comparison would be my dislike of the characters in zadie smith's "nw" because smith and laird are married.

"glover's mistake" is the tale of a love triangle:  david is in love with this old art teacher ruth but she falls in love with his roommate james glover. initially, i felt bad for david because he tried to date ruth but was unsuccessful.  david did not aggressively pursue ruth and as a result their relationship went straight into the friends zone.  ruth then meet james through david and is instantly attracted to him.  i felt bad for david because it is obvious that he was going to suffer.  he lost the woman he loved to his roommate. my sympathies did not last long because it turns out david was a jerk and a little bat shit crazy. david sabotaged their relationship,  going so far as creating a fake email to tell
ruth about james' infidelty (james did have a one night stand but in his defense he was a virgin prior to dating ruth so i think he should be forgiven).  david also made james insecure about ruth's lesbian past and friendship with an old lover.  quick note:  i couldn't decide if glover's mistake was the infidelity or his insecurity about ruth being a lesbian.

but even with david's evilness, i couldn't cheer for james and ruth.  their relationship did move way too quickly.  they got engaged after a couple of months of dating (or was it weeks).    there was an age difference which didn't bother me but i was concern about their difference in terms of life experience. it was her second marriage and his first real relationship.  i mean ruth had a list of lovers of both sexes and james was virgin.  (i would like to add that i think the best kind of guy to fall in love with is the kind like james.  the kind that was dorky or fat in high school who then grow up to be handsome.  all of these good looks and no conceit).  also they didn't seem to have much in common other than sex.  i mean if laird gave david and ruth's relationship some depth i would have wanted to see their love win but since he didn't i couldn't decide if i want david or them to win in the end.  and that is ultimately the problem with the book, i didn't know whose team i was on.  the thing about love triangles is that you should want to choose a side (see: team jacob or team edward) but here both sides sucked so i didn't become invested.

granted i have only read one jane austen book but i totally became invested because i cared about the characters.  at first i was on team wickham and then of course team darcy.  but the point is that i chose a side.  so sorry chicago tribune but this was not like an austen novel.  

i must add i am not giving up on laird, just like i didn't give up on smith, i still plan on reading their other works to see what the hype is about.

and one last thing, i did find ruth's art intriguing.  i wish the "republic of women"  really did exist, it would be an interesting piece.  i like the idea of ruth creating "artefacts" for a lost female
only civilization, i especially would have liked to have seen the menstruation headdress.  as i read, i was reminded of judy chicago's "dinner party".  i should google, maybe laird based is ruth's art on something in real life.


Tuesday, June 4, 2013

30 books to read before 30 according to me

so here is my list of 30 before 30.

1.  to kill a mockingbird- harper lee
2.  the catcher in the rye- j.d. salinger*
3.  the perks of being a wallflower- stephen chobsky*
4.  dandelion wine- ray bradbury
5.  one hundred years of solitude- gabriel garcia marquez
6.  a tree grows in brooklyn- betty smith*
7.  everything is illuminated- jonathan safran foer
8. on the road- jack kerouac**
9. the picture of dorian gray- oscar wilde
9. lord of the flies- william golding*
10.  middlesex- jeffrey eugenides
11. 1984- george orwell*
12. pride and prejudice- jane austen
13. this side of paradie- f. scott fitzgearld
14. the sun also rises- ernest hemingway** 
15. a clockwork orange- anthony burgess
16. maus- art spiegelman
17. war and peace- leo tolstoy
18. breakfast at tiffany's- truman capote
19. the house on mango street- sandra cisneros
20. jane eyre- charlotte brönte
21. the bell jar- sylvia plath
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27. something by haruki murakami (i recommend "norwegian wood")
28. something by shakespare
29. brave new world- aldous huxley***
30.  the bible*** (amended 6.6.13)

so i only have 24 books.  i have a lot more classics that i need to read before i can finish this list.  so accept this now and i promise to have an updated list by my 31st birthday.

*read in high school
**read in early twenties
***i haven't read.


flavorpill's 30 books to read before 30.

today is my 30th birthday and if you have been reading my blog, you know that i have been on a mission to read the 30 books that flavorpill recommends one should read before they are 30. you can check out the article here.  i sadly failed and only read 20 books but figure too much won't happen in the first 6 months of my being 30, so giving myself til december to read the 10 i need.  which won't be too small a feat considering "infinite jest" is still on the list.  

but decided to give you a breakdown of their list:

iliad and the odyssey by homer-  didn't read it.  checked it out from the library but it was in novel form and i think i want to read it as a poem.

the secret history by donna tart- though a good novel, it didn't contain any greatness that demanded it needed to be read before 30.  the characters are undergrad but didn't provide any insight for your college experience except maybe watch out for cultish programs.

jesus' son by denis johnson- this wasn't for me, a great writer but was not interested in the narrator's life.   if i read it at 18, i would have thought it amazing.

the complete stories by flannery o'connor-  i had the library copy for about 6 weeks but couldn't get into it.  all of her stories made me uncomfortable.  i read "a good man is hard to find" because i felt i should at least have that read before i turn 30, but it just scared me.  also not sure if southern goth is for me.

much ado about nothing by william shakespeare- i agree that you should have some shakespeare under you belt before you turn 30, but not necessarily this play.  it had too much dialogue and old school word play for me to enjoy. read "macbeth" instead.

the sun also rises by ernest hemingway- the first book of his i ever read and definitely needs to be on this list.  should be read in your 1st/2nd year of college to guarantee that you study abroad and probably in spain.

the road by cormac mccarthy- didn't read it.

maus by art spiegelman- this was a beautiful book and should definitely be read before 30.  also it's a graphic novel (read: comic book) but very powerful.

ender's game by orson scott card- this should actually be part of a 18 books to read before you turn 18.  it's a young adult novel do read it as a young adult.

pride and prejudice by jane austen-  this is 
a timeless classic and needs to be read.  i love now flavorpill says guys too, because i was surprised when my uncle john told me he was a fan of this work!  also it's worth the read just so you can picture colin firth as darcy! literary eye candy!

cat's cradle by kurt vonnegut- didn't read it though it's on my kindle.

lolita by vladmir nabokov- needs to be read because it is always cited as the best novel of all time.  nabokov has a way with words but still the premise makes me uncomfortable.

lord of the rings by j.r.r. tolkien- still on the library wait list for this one.

1984 by george orwell- definitely needs to be read but again as part of the 18 before 18.  

the catcher in the rye- one of my favorite books of all times.  read it young though. i will love holden regardless of my age but i know some people's dislike grows with their age.

the great gatsby by f. scott fitzgerald- this novel has grown on me but i think if i read it in my early twenties i would have thought it great.  though think "this side of paradise" is better.

beloved by toni morrison- a great novel but not sure why it was on the list. though it is important because it gives a voice to slaves.

infinite jest by david foster wallace- picked it up but didn't have the time to
read it.  also need to read hamlet firsts. will try to get it done while on summer break.

lord of the flies by william golding- this should be read in high school.  and important read for both genders but especially for boys.

don quixote by miguel de cervantes- need to read it.

the trial by franz kafka- need to read it.

to the lighthouse by virgina woolf-  this should be read before 40, but not 30.  

fahrenheit 451 by ray bradbury-  another book that should be read in high school. bradbury is a poet.  i loved this book when i read it in high school but feel like "dandelion wine" is the better book.

invisible man by ralph ellison- need to read it.

to kill a mockingbird by harper lee- this book is amazing at any age.  atticus finch is one of the greatest characters ever! and i love scout, jem, boo and dill. read this before 30 but reread it throughout your life.

treasure island by robert louis stevenson- bought if for a dollar but haven't read it.



Monday, June 3, 2013

the catcher in the rye. j. d. salinger.


i first heard of "the catcher in the rye" in the 1997 film "conspiracy theory" starring julia roberts and mel gibson.  in the film, gibson's character shared a conspiracy theory about how assassins are obsessed with the novel.  also gibson's character had an odd impulse to buy "the catcher in the rye" and looked for it in every bookstore he walked by.  i will admit that due to the film, every time i was in a bookstore, i would wander over to the s section to look for "catcher" (i was an odd kid).  but thanks to the film, i read it and fell in love with "the catcher in the rye" and it became one of my favorite books. on my first read, my favorite part was how holden kept on asking where the ducks went in the winter.  i though it was such a quirky thing to ask and couldn't believe no one had an answer for him.  i will also admit that i missed the whole him writing his story from a mental institution thing.

i read "catcher", my junior year on my own and then mr. brice (one of my favorite teachers) assigned it my senior year.  in fact, the copy i reread (for this blog) was from my senior year, though not mine, i somehow ended up with stephen warren's book:
 

i remember we had an assignment in which we had to draw what was in holden's mind.  i drew the ducks at the lagoon, allie's baseball mitt, his red hunting hat (which i drew more of like a three musketeers hat but with less brim because of all the talk of it's peak, i now know what a hunting hat looks like thanks to google), a checker board with all the kings in the back row and a carousel.  what is interesting, the images i drew were still my favorite parts during the reread, especially allie's mitt covered 
in poetry.  i was relieved that these images stood out to me because i was worried i would not enjoy "catcher", as an  adult.

since i am going to new york this weekend, i decided to reread "catcher" because the protagonist in "truth in advertising" retraced holden's footsteps when he first moved to new york. i want to do the same but decided i should save it for a trip in the winter, it wouldn't be the same to have the ducks there.  also it is on flavorpill's 30 before 30 and figured i should give it another read before i am old.  i was worried about reading it again but as you have seen with other classics, i discovered that i should have read them when i was younger to get their full effect.  i was scared i would be annoyed by holden and all of his talk about phonies but in fact i loved him just the same.  i still
think it is better to meet holden when you are in high school but i had a better understanding of him when i met him again as an adult.

as a teen, his perspectives on life and society left an impression on me, even though i was the anti-holden.  i was a well-adjusted kid, got good grades, involved in a bunch of extra-curricular activities, stayed out of trouble and didn't hate the world or anything.  but i was at the age where i was starting to question authority, not my parents but school administration and church regulations.  i was starting to see that adults didn't have all the answers or necessarily did what was right and so holden's talk of phonies and all of the contradictions within society was eye opening. he demonstrated not to take the world at face value and you should question society.

i am not saying that holden didn't have issues.  he definitely did but he was also misunderstood, i realized that when i caught myself judging him.  it was when he discussed how he hates people with cheap luggage.  at first, i thought he was being pretentious but after he shared the story of his roommate with cheap luggage that tried to pass off holden's luggage as his own, his hatred made sense.  he didn't hate cheap luggage it was a metaphor for his hatred of how expensive things make others feel inferior.  i thought it was nice how he tried to hide his luggage to make his roommate feel comfortable.  holden was actually full of good intentions, just like this.  he was caring which is why he wanted to be a catcher in the rye; to save and protect others. deep down inside, holden had a heart of gold, he just had issues because of his brother allie's death.  

on this reread, i realized for the first time how much allie's death affected holden.  i knew he had a difficult time with allie's death, the breaking widows and even missing the funeral due to being in the hospital.  i thought holden's issues were due to him feeling like an outcast from society but his alienation was the result of his brother's death.  as a teen, death is an abstract concept, those that die around us are usually older and so it makes sense, there is no need to question the universe for its actions. however it is not the same when it's with someone young.  i only had older relatives die when i was young, so i never made the connection as to how a sibling's death at a young age can affect someone.  but now i can imagine how it must have been for holden.  no wondered he hated the world, he was dealt a bad hand. it also explained why holden was so hung up on saying good-bye.  his searching for a sense of farewell during his final days at pencey seemed odd but was understandable in this context.  it also explained why he wanted to make sure to tell phoebe bye instead of just leaving as he did with everyone else.  (and luckily he did because he then got the help that he needed.)

the loss of allie left a void in holden's life which he could not fill with actual friends (with the exception of jane).  i think a lot of people who read "catcher" get caught up on the fact the hired a prostitute or was constantly calling up people to go out drinking.  but it wasn't because he was a sex fiend or an alcoholic but simply he was lonely.  he sadly did not have anyone in his life except his sister.  it made me sad how desperately he tried to make friends at bars, i was genuinely embarrassed for him every time he tried to buy someone a drink.  though i will admit that if i was carl luce, i would have left him too, he was so annoying with his sex talk. but i forgave him in the book because i saw how goddamn lonely he was.

random sidenote:  but i thought it was admirable how holden respected that no meant no even though he talked about sex a lot.

as i said before i am not denying that holden needed to be psychoanalyzed. his talk of killing or injuring people was very disturbing.  another thing i better understood on the reread was his moment of what would appear to be schizophrenia.  living in la, i encountered a lot of homeless schizophrenics talking to themselves, this was not the case in delano.  due to this, as a teen, i didn't think much of holden talking to allie as he walked around but now i get how crazy he must have looked.  i had always thought it as sweet, keeping allie's memory alive but the talking to him was a huge indication of holden's need for help.  also he was a pathological liar too.  though i do forgive him for lying to that one's kid's mother on the train cos no one wants to hear how their kid is actually an asshole.

but i am glad he did get help because holden is one of my favorite characters. i want to be hopeful about his future.  i really do think holden and i would have been good friends.  there were so many random things he said that i totally got.  

like when he talks about good books:

what really knocks me out is a book that, when you're all done reading it, you wish the author that wrote it was a terrific friend of yours and you could call him
io on the phone whenever you felt like it.

i wish some of my favorite authors were my friends.  i also agreed with him that "a farewell to arms" is horrible, i have no idea why people like it when hemingway has written better. also loved how he quoted "old sport" from "gatsby".

i also love his quote "i'm illiterate but i read a lot."

though morbid, i do agree with his "who wants flowers when your dead? nobody!" i don't want flowers right now alive.  

there are a handful of other gems he shares but this blog is already long so i won't continue.

as i mentioned before i read this as part of flavorpill's 30 before 30, i also said that i thought it was best to read in high school but a reread in your late twenties is good, especially during your "return of saturn" or if you having a quarter life crisis.  if you know me, you know i love birthdays but i also have peter pan syndrome.  but i am dreading turning 30 tomorrow, like sylvia plath-ing it sounds like a good alternative to getting old.  and oddly enough this book was the perfect read for me on the eve of my birthday because like me, holden is scared of growing up.

holden and i both share a love of natural history museums.  my favorite part of the museums are the dioramas, i love seeing the taxidermy animals in their habitats.  there is something magical about the darkness of the hall and the bright lights and scenes in the dioramas.  however, as i read holden's description of the natural history museum, i saw why holden and i both love natural history museums.  it is because time is on pause  in natural history museums . holden discussed how he loved how phoebe can experience the museum just as he did because it stays the same.  i never thought of it that way but this makes sense.  if i could pause life like a diorama, i would, there are so many times in life where i am just so content that i wish it could last forever. also life is preserved in natural history museums and i am very nostalgic, my past is filled with so many great memories, that i often revisit it via pictures. it's the same for holden, his past has his brother alive so he would want it that way as well.  

another way we are similar is our attempts to avoid growing up. i never took notice of it on my previous reads but if i was sally hayes, i would jump at the opportunity to runway to vermont or massachusetts.  choose a simple life instead of one complicated with education, class, wealth and social norms. but alas just like holden, i have to grow up and become a mature (read: married and with kids) person.  its odd because i thought i learned this in high school when i had my whole life ahead of me but i guess i needed to read it again.



Sunday, June 2, 2013

much ado about nothing. william shakespeare. (114)


much ado about nothing is right.  i should have listened to the title, there is much ado in this play but it's all for nothing.

i was looking forward to reading "much ado" because the flavorpill team, well maybe just the writer of that post, cited it as their favorite shakespeare play.  but then it turned out to be much ado about nothing.

so the plot is quite simple but also pointless and sadly the result of a bitter man, don john, who hates his brother, don pedro and is jealous of claudio.  actually i found this amazing reviewer on goodreads that does abridged version of shakespeare plays.  i will link it here.  hilarious, right?  but seriously that is all there is to the play.  a bunch of pointless deceit and lies and in the end, everyone is in love and there is a double wedding!  and seriously the whole mask wearing at the wedding? i know it makes everything come full circle but it was so silly.

i think the issue i had was that there was too much dialogue and so many character, it was difficult to keep everything straight.  plus everyone was way too witty, i consider myself quick-witted, but given that the play is over 400 year old, most of that wit went over my head.  i mean i didn't even bother with the banter between the watch, it just didn't seem worth the effort to read sparknotes to understand jokes that probably would not make me laugh.

i did enjoy the exchanges between beatrice and benedick.  i even had a crush in my early twenties that started off like theirs.  a co-worker and i used to always tease each other in a non-flirty way, and our other co-workers started to question if we liked each other.  i actually hadn't thought of him in that manner until everyone started to say things and then oddly enough a crush did develop. and  no we did not end up married.

and i know as a girl, i should have been a huge fan of beatrice but i didn't fall in love with her.  i loved how sharp-tongued she was and gave it to benedick.  but after a while i got tired of her oh-i-don't-want-to-be-married-but-secretly-do. maybe her bemoaning of never bemoaning about marriage, just hit too close to home for me.  i mean she said something that i would totally say esp after attending my friend mona's wedding:

"this goes everyone to the world [of marriage] but i, and i am sunburnt. i may sit in a corner as cry "heigh-ho for a husband."

spot on me, down to the idea thinking tanned me is ugly.  lol.  i know she is this great shakespeare female character but she didn't wow me.  i think if i saw her in action aka in play and not on paper, i would have adored her.  i think an actress needed to add the sass needed her to be read.  my mind just read and didn't act.

i don't want to have much more to ado with this play so will wrap up with some random final thoughts:

-wow! way to go friar! for seeing the truth in hero's soul!  and coming up with that plan! so clever.  

-how was margaret not fired for getting it on in hero's bedroom?!?!

-seriously were identities that well hidden at the party?

-why was everyone willing to trust don john?  and what was his problem?!?!

-did anyone find it awkward how willing claudio was so quick to marry hero's lookalike cousin?!?

-also does the phrase "catch my drift" have shakespearen origins? don pedro said "go in with me, and i will tell you my drift." (his drift is the plan to get beatrice and benedick together)

maybe i am have been too harsh, i think "much ado about nothing" needs to be experience as it was intended as a play versus a book.  so i will see it before i make a final judgement.  also there is a movie version coming out or maybe it out so will try to see it.  and one last random fact, keanu reeves played in don john in a 90's film version.  imagine that!



Saturday, June 1, 2013

macbeth. william shakespeare.

(this play is in complication so that is where there is no book cover.)

since next weekend i will be seeing the play "sleep no more" in nyc, i decided i should probably read the shakespeare play that it is based on, so i can know what is going on.  i should add "sleep no more" has no dialogue and the audience wears masks (yes if you saw that "law and order" episode, it's like that, well minus the rape) do that was part of the reason as well.

before i go on i have to admit what a horrible drama student i was.  the drama teacher at delano high school was obsessed with shakespeare and that was all he ever directed.  due to thid, i was in a production of "macbeth", as a chorus member.  it was for a festival at chapman, which i did just to go on a field trip.  and though i was in it, all i remember was the witches' "double double" and lady macbeth's (played by my friend kaley) "out damn spot" and "unsex me now" lines.  and even though i sat through a handful of practice and performances, i had no idea what the play was about until i read it.  and even than i needed sparknotes.com to help me understand it completely.

i consider myself an intelligent person but shakespeare is so beyond me!  i would read a couple of acts then consult sparknotes.com to make sure i understood what was going on.  most of the time i did but i did miss that whole forest moving prediction and then it's actual happening.

but back to the play, it was really dark.  so much death!  and lady macbeth!  talk about malicious!!! though in the end she did commit suicide due to the guilt so she wasn't a complete sociopath, demonstrating she was capable of remorse. but she was quite frightening at the beginning with her murder plots and talk of dashing the brains of a suckling infant.  that part was manically cruel, who has thoughts like that?!?!  even her talk of killing duncan herself was insane.  and she did have the best lines "unsex me now" a demand to lose her femininity so she can destroy life.  though since shakespearen time, women have proven that they are just as capable of murder as men.

i also enjoyed the plot twist at the end when macduff revealed that he was not born but take from the womb early.  interesting! what a surprise! and then macduff presented macbeth's head at the end.  there was a lot of gory scenes in this and then add in the witches and banquo's ghost roaming around, though i haven't read anything else, it's pretty dark for shakespeare right?  and seriously what a bad move on macbeth's end for killing the chamberlains, it was really odd when he announced that.

oh and way to go shakespeare for his grand tradition of perverted scenes, so random to have the porter talking about whiskey dick.  but i guess something to keep the mood light.

and of course so many great lines that influenced others:

"by the prickling of my thumb,
something wicked this way come":  ray bradbury

"life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
that struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
and then is heard no more.  it is a tale
told by an idiot, full of sound and fury , 
signifying nothing.":  faulkner

"weird sisters.":  j.k. rowlings

"methought i heard a voice cry 'sleep no more! macbeth does murther sleep.'":  the play i am going to see.

so excited for the play and glad i will have a better understanding of it.  oh and i will make sure not to say "macbeth" in the theater as warned by friend ferlay.  i will use "the scottish play" to avoid dying or having an accident.




z: a novel of zelda fitzgerald. therese anne fowler. (113)


of course with the release of the latest film version of "the great gatsby", there would be a resurgence of interest in the fitzgeralds.  so when i heard about "z" by therese anne fowler, a novel about zelda fitzgerald, i had to check it out!

my interest in the fitzgeralds came via woody allen's "midnight in paris". the fitzgeralds especially zelda with her "lets go i am bored" demands were a delight.  and of course, all the myths about their partying intrigued me.  as a result, i read his novels (except the last tycoon) and hers plus a handful of their short stories.  and as a result of that read their wikipedia page to find out what was true in their books and it seemed like their novels were pretty autobiographical.  though intrigued by their life, i never picked up a bio or a book of their letters.  but i wish i had.

if i had read a bio, i would not have spent the whole novel thinking, did this really happen? i mean i know it is a novel but i hadn't realized zelda had called off their engagement though "this side of paradise" alludes to that.  i also didn't realize that the housekeeper from "the beautiful and the damned" was real.  also the squirrel coat really existed too!  or that the actress from "tender is the night" was based on lois moran, i knew the novel's affair was based on a real affair but didn't realize it was based on an actual actress that young (i had to google her, and she will only be famous for her literary counterpart).  i wanted to read nancy milford's bio of zelda which has been sitting on my bookshelf but since "z" is due back at the library on thursday didn't think i had the time.  oh well, this has sparked my need to read that, reread "save me the waltz" and another novel called "beautiful fools" about scott's last affair.

so back to "z", though interesting, i will admit that at times i did get a bit bored.  i mean i got it, scott was an alcoholic and as a result was a horrible husband.  in an afterword, fowler discussed how there are two camps "team scott" or "team zelda" when it comes to who was the victim in their destructive relationship.  i have always been team zelda, i mean, have you read a "tender is the night" and "save me the waltz"?!?! both novels discuss the same period in their life and i read scott as the destructive one.  sure nicole and alabama were instituationlized but its known some women were instituationlized for having "crazy" thought of independence and rejecting the cult of domesticity versus actual
illness.  

this point of view of zelda's bouts in mental institutions was interested and i appreciated fowler's presentation of it as such.  as i read about z's (i'll use z for the character in the book and zelda for the real zelda) time in institutions it demonstrated how she was not crazy but just rejected the traditional female roles society forced upon her.  she didn't want to stay at home and live a life of leisure.  she wanted to participate in the social sphere.  in addition to that,  she wanted to be seen as an individual from her husband.  and what did scott expect? the very spirit and personality he fell in love with was the same one he tried to mute later in life.  and plus with all the alcohol involved plus the partying its no surprised they had issues (see:  my life 2007-10).  also it was sad to see how writing was good therapy for z but she was not allowed to do it.  

in the afterword, fowler also mentioned zelda was probably misdiagnosed and today would be diagnosed as bipolar.  also her meds harmed her more than help.  though i think it was the time period that was against her versus any mental illness, it reminded me of the book "girl interrupted", these women were not crazy only had too progressive thoughts for the time period. z's "illness" was really just an unwillingness to conform to female gender roles.

though i did appreciate fowler's painting of z's institutionalization, there were some things i could have done without.  one being all the hemingway nonsense. i get that hemingway and zelda hated each other but that scene when hem made a pass at z was way too graphic for my liking.  z had her outlandish moments but that seemed really out of character.   also i did not enjoy all the fairy talk.  i know cole porter was questationable (i did see "de-lovely" and fairy or not he is one of my favorite songwriters) but did people really question ernest and scott's relationship?!?  and then the scene with scott's moaning?  i think that was all done in poor taste.

[author's note:  so i just finished reading in nancy milford's biography,"zelda", that the moaning incident did occur.  and there was talk of hemingway and fitzgerald being faires!]

and my last critique is that fowler's "z" wasn't as colorful as the real zelda.  zelda's works are always filled with clever little lines and musings but there wasn't too much of that in "z".  i mean fowler tried but didn't succeed.  also i got tried of z interrupting awkward moments with a comment about dancing.  though i guess she was the epitome of the flapper girl.

all in all, glad i read it since it sparked a new interest in the fitzgeralds.  but left me wondering what really went on.  and as a result,  i plan on reading alot more about f. scott and zelda.

ps i totally forgot.  so the book is divided into parts and have an epigraph.  all of them were quite delightful:


always be drunk:

thought this quite clever since scott was a wordsmith:

and of course how great was the dedication page: