gumption: relighting the torch of freedom with america's gutsiest troublemakers. nick offerman (308)

i learned of nick offerman's gumption:  relighting the torch of freedom with america's gutsiest troublemakers at bookcon.  i knew he had written another book but assumed it was autobiographical but discovered at his panel it was about americans he admired for their gumption.  i have to add that he brought out both john hodgman and paul rudd during his panel, and yes, rudd was a huge distraction for me.

to be completely honest, this work did not live up to my expectation.  i had expected profiles of some great americans, but what i really got was some interesting facts, offerman gushing about why he loved them, and then some random discussion on politics, life, social media, etc.  i mean the points he made were interesting, but after a while it just got too redundant.  although i love ron swanson, i don't feel that close to offerman, as say, amy poehler or aziz ansari, so all of his random jokes where more awkward than funny. or maybe i am being mean, i just didn't literally laugh out loud as i read, though i am sure there was an the expectation that i did.

that being said, i learned a lot, just wish i had learned more and plan on doing some further reading with the books he suggested for further reading. 

my absolute favorite profile was yoko ono, perhaps because she was the person that i was the most familiar. i loved how offerman started off with admitting how he was judgmental about her, believing in the music folklore that she had broke up the beatles, but thanks to his wife, megan mullally, he saw the light.  and can i just add way to go mullally for purchasing some yoko art, i would have purchased a piece if i could afford it.  anyway, it was lovely to read about how she and john met through her art.  something that i didn't know, but i recognized the pieces because i attended her one woman show at the moma this past may.  i knew of the apple that john was intrigued by and was frustrated when i couldn't climb the ladder to read the message on the ceiling like john did.  but yes, it is amazing that her message was one of positivity and not negativity.  i should add that the book closes with a photo of this piece.  i like offerman found it amazing how she still lived in the dakota.  i am also amazed by her continued activism for social progress.  i really want a poster that says "war on women is over (if you want it)" or maybe a shirt.  but yes i loved the chapter on yoko ono and will be doing some further reading on her.

i also plan on reading more about eleanor roosevelt.  i had no idea that she and franklin d. were distant cousins.  i also loved reading about how she stuck to her beliefs regardless of what her husband supported.  eleanor lobbied for a bill that made lynching illegal in the south, even though her husband was worried that he would lose southern support.  she was also against imprisoning the japanese americans in internment camps after pearl harbor.  again i would have loved to read more about her, but am glad that offerman pointed me in the right direction to read more about her.

maybe it's the feminist in me, but i also plan on reading more about carol burnett.  i used to watch reruns of the carol burnett show, as a kid.  my grandma turned me on to her.  i remember laughing though i don't remember any specific jokes.  i would really love to revisit her show.  it was extraordinary to learn of her humble beginnings and to see that she is a fellow bruin!

the other woman that sparked an interest in me and one that i had never heard of was laurie anderson.  her music and art sounds amazing.  also i loved that she ordered a grilled cheese and bourbon when she and offerman met up.  i did like her idea about reverse boot camp, i feel like we do need to help our servicemen and woman return back to civilian life.  i didn't put in a request for her work, but will later on down the road.

i loved the conan o'brien chapter.  who knew he was so intelligent? and i have to admit it made him really sexy.  it was great to read his thoughts especially about how we view these times, i agree that we romanticize the past and the world is really not as bad as we think it is.  also conan knows his stuff, i mean he is a harvard grad and a history major.  i mean i would love to read books about history from him or even just a book about his life.  why hasn't that happen yet?  also since sadly there are no books, about conan, his further reading section, included books that he mentioned in his chapter.  i think i will read his books just for fun!

i enjoyed reading about james madison, we really do owe a lot to him.  i had no idea how crucial he was to the creating of the constitution and the bill of rights.  also, love that he was a big reader.  (actually alot of people featured were big readers.)

speaking of big readers, the stories in theodore roosevelt's chapter was awesome.  i mean he got shot during a speech and continued on with his speech! talk about impressive!

the chapter on frederick law olmsted was really interested.  thanks to my friend ivan, i have learning about new york, and how it came to be, so loved learning about olmsted and the designing of central park.  it was great to know that olmsted wanted the park to be one everyone and not just the rich.  i also learned that the entrances are labeled different, next time i am in nyc, i'm looking for the strangers' entrance and the warriors' entrance.  another central park bucket list item for me is to eat at tavern on the green.  i also plan on going to prospect park, which is supposed to be he and his partner, valux's best work.  i have been to the brooklyn museum but never explored the park.

i did enjoy micheal pollen's chapter, i would like to read his work, the omnivore's dilemma but am worried they may change my diet.  but i love my food! i will check out the rest of his works, i just don't read much non-fiction, but will add him to my to-be read list.

i sadly wasn't familiar with the writers mentioned, though i did recall coming across george saunder's congratulations by the way on california bookstore day, but didn't buy it.  however, i think i will given it read.

last but not least, i enjoyed read about george nakashima, a furniture maker.  his story was incredible because he was in an internment camp during world war II, after which, he started marking furniture and became successful.

the individuals that offerman wrote about were interested, again i would have liked to see more about them, versus offerman's opinion of them or thoughts he inspired by him.  if you like offerman, check it out, but just know that you there will much left to be desired, so hit up that further reading list.

further reading (for my personal reference):
 the autobiography of eleanor roosevelt eleanor roosvelt
days that i'll remmber: spending time with john lennon and yoko ono joanthan clott
all we are saying: the last major interview with john lennon and yoko ono david sheff
one more time carol burnett
this time together carol burnett
stories from the nerve bible:  a twenty-year retrospective laurie anderson
king lear shakespeare
the beatles:  the biography bob spitz
the soul of a tree george nakashima
congratulations, by the way geroge saunders
a clearing in the distance witold rybczynski
and michael pollan's works

caramelo. sandra cisneros.

since i planned on attending sandra cisneros' talk at csub, i figured i should read more than just one book so i picked up her second novel "caramelo" (and for a dollar!). though i did not finish it before her talk, it helped me understand her talk and life a little more.

to be perfectly honest, i didn't like "caramelo" at first. i kept thinking to myself, this is no "house on mango street" but i realized it shouldn't be. that is always the challenge with the sophomore novel (and also the sophomore album for bands). i once read an article about the yeah yeah yeah's sophomore album in rolling stone, which discussed the challenge of the sophomore album, especially when the first is a huge success. the audience wants the band to replicate their first work but then it can't sound completely the same or they will be upset by that as well. i think it's the same with books, the sophomore novel needs to replicate the first but not be the same. and to me it felt that cisneros at first was trying to replicate "the house on mango street" but then it transform into something completely different but still very cisneros.

i always think of "house on mango street" as a collection of poems however i would describe "caramelo" as an epic. this is cisneros' "one hundred years of solitude" (which i was reminded of as i read, in addition to being one of my favorite books of all time).  "caramelo" is the tale of three generations of the reyes family, grounded in cisneros' actual family history with a hint of mythical magic like garcia marquez' work.  as i discovered at her talk, cisneros' life served as the basis for this novel, she grew up in chicago, the youngest of seven brothers and her father was a upholsterer, just like celaya in the novel.  but like her wig analogy, the novel is real life stories mixed in with fiction so it is non-fictional fiction or fictional non-fiction.

i guess it is the historian in me but i love sagas.  i always have.  i hate to admit this but as a tween (though this term was not invented back then) my favorite sweet valley high books were the sagas because i loved discovering the family histories.  i loved seeing the sequence of events that caused life to follow a certain path; how moment a lead to moment b which explains how c ever came into occurrence.  and this is what i loved about "caramelo", reading how the stars aligned to form the life that celaya led.   for me, "carmaelo" did not become an interesting read until we traveled back into time to learn her families' history so we could understand celaya as a person.  and that was the lesson of the novel, to understand oneself the best and who one is, s/he need to understand her/his ancestors.

 cisneros' emphasis on the importance of knowing the past is not limited to personal histories but extended to capital h-history.  my favorite part of the book was the historical tidbits that cisneros included.  her characters randomly interacted with important cultural figures.  thanks to her i learned about josephine baker*, maria sabina , senor wences, tongolele, and cri cri.  i also learned that some famous hollywood starlets were mexican (see:  rita hayworth).  another fact that surprised me was the story of emperor maximiliano and empress carlota, i didn't know that they were puppet monarchs nor did i know that bette davis played her in the movie.  i also finally discovered the title of the song "cielito lindo".  as i read the lyrics to "cielito lindo", i oddly knew the melody from years of hearing it growing up though  i never knew it was called "cielito lindo".  the tidbits were great because aside from being an entertaining novel, it was also educational.

the novel was also filled with cultural observations.  for example, how taquerias smell like pine-sol.   or introducing the updated version of the aged old question, which came first real life or the telenovla?  there were also sad and harsh observations like how chicanos treat mexicans who claim their spanish roots.  another sad observation is how the INS treats veterans like illegal immigrants especially when those individuals gained their citizenships by serving in a war.  and lastly how mexican mothers can be overbearing and strict but that is really because they are lonely.  there was a handful of times i had ah-ha moments because cisneros shed light on mexican and mexican-american cultures or explanation to certain stereotypes.

in addition to sharing truths, "caramelo" was filled with cisneros' poetic flair, which i have come to love. my favorite were:

"a person of independence, who does not need nor want us, inspires our admiration, and admiration is love portion.  a person who needs us too much, who is weak with neediness, inspires pity.  and pity, the other side of admiration, is antidote to love."

" a dream is a poem the body writes.  even if we lie to ourselves in the day, the body is compelled to speak its truth at night."

"for a long time after, i'd just burst into tears, if anyone even touched me. [ . . .] anybody touched me, by accident or on purpose, i cried.  i was like a piece of bread sopped with gravy.  so when something squeezed me, i started to cry and couldn't stop.  have you ever been that sad?  like a donut dunked in coffee?  like a book left in the rain."

lastly, two of my favorite images included food; feet as tamales and mentions of clean towels that fresh tortillas are kept in.  both of which all made me extremely hungry every time i read about them.  also does anyone know where i can get a tamal sandwich?!?!?!

imagery aside, the most important aspect of "caramelo" is that it shares an experience that is not always told. during my last year at ucla, i took a seminar about the american immigrant experience and we read autobiographies. the class focused on autobiographies not only as a counter to the dominant history (or white male american history) but stories that need to be integrated into the dominant history so that it can be complete. america is not america without the immigrant experience. furthermore, since so much land of present america was once a part of mexico and with mexicans going back and forth across the border; the american experience would be incomplete without the mexican/mexican-american experience being told. and though things can be labelled as a specific racial, cultural or religious experience, at the heart of it all, it is simply a human experience. this is true of "caramelo", it can not be reduce to just mexican lit, chicano it or womens lit because it holds a valuable lesson for everyone regardless of how one labels oneself. that lesson being the importance of everyone knowing their family history and roots. though "caramelo" was filled with a very specific cultural experience, it still possessed universal truths.

like cisneros i will add una pilón.

i loved this part because it reminded me of my grandmother, not so much because we have had the same conversation.  but because my grandma bea, like ceyala's little grandmother, keeps it real.

when discussing her running away with ernesto, ceyala explained:

"-but i saw god when we made love."

to which the little grandmother responded:

"-of course you did.  you think that's a miracle?  smell a flower and you'll see god too.  god's everywhere. and yes, he's in the act of love too.  and so?  that boy's not the only one who can love you like that.  there'll be others, there ought to others, you must have others."

*josephine baker is amazing.  i googled her and read her wikipedia entry (click and read it!).  and she is simply amazing.  she started off dancing on the streets then became this international sensation.  then became an international spy during world war II!!!! and was the first angelina jolie and adopted 12 children from different racial/national background.  amazing right?!?!?