Showing posts with label shirley jackson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shirley jackson. Show all posts

Monday, July 21, 2014

the lottery and other stories. shirley jackson. (216)



after reading we always lived in the castle, i decided to check out shirley jackson's other works.  i am too chicken shit to read the house on haunting hill, so instead decided to check out her short story, "the lottery".  wikipedia claimed it as "one of the most famous short stories in American literature", so i decided to give it a read.  it did take me a while to build up the courage to read it.  though we always lived in the castle was more creepy and demented then outright scary, i was still weary of reading "the lottery". i wasn't sure what to expect.

if you have never read "the lottery", stop right here and go read it.  it won't take you long.  also stop here if you plan on reading it because a there are spoilers.

***spoilers****

turns out, i was worried for nothing.  "the lottery" though demented did not scare me like i had anticipated.  in fact, it was a little lackluster, though i blame the hunger games for my lack of shock, i knew someone was going to die.  "the lottery" is the story of a lottery; every year, in order to reap a good harvest of corn, the village, as all villages do, gather for the lottery.  there was talk among the villagers that some villages had stopped it, but their talk disapproved of the breaking of tradition.  the whole village gathered and all the heads of the family, picked a piece of paper from a black box (sounds like the katniss and her story, right?).  the family with the black dot must then picked again.  then the family member with the black dot is  . . . stoned to death.  shocking and demented, but not that surprising since in the hunger games someone is elected to die to benefit the collective.  i wonder if collins was inspired by "the lottery", i mean as i read, i felt like i was reading the hunger games.  but jackson, the better writer, had the guts to kill the person, sending home the message of how dangerous outdated traditions can be.  i feel like every analysis that i read about jackson's "the lottery" and her a handful of other short stories, mentioned her call against conformity, and that is clearly seen in this story.  a great story, and i think i would have found it absolutely brilliant, if my mind had not been tainted by the hunger games first.

i ended up reading the rest of the stories in this collection (it is the year of the short story).  i was expecting them to be dark and scary like ghost stories, but they really weren't.  i mean they were dark, jackson is american gothic (though i am not truly sure of what is meant by the term because i never finished flannery o'connor's collection of short stories).  they were enjoyable reads and many contained very important morals.

one of the darker ones i enjoyed was "the daemon lover", which i discovered takes its name from scottish ballad about a man james harris (the name harris also appears in alot of stories, i am not sure why, i almost felt like jackson's stories came from the same universe, think pixar universe, and so harris' mentioned were all the same person!) who lures a lover away from her family and husband.  in the short story, a woman, was waiting for her lover, jamie or james harris.  they are to be married that day but he never shows up.  she then went on a wild goose chase after him.  at first, you feel bad for her because she can not find him, but then you start to question if she is sane.  she ended up outside of an apartment where she hears voices.  it is then shared that she returns to the apartment every day trying to find him.  so yes in fact, she was crazy.

another i loved was "charles". i knew the ending before i read it, simply from having to deal with kids all the time.  the story is told from the perspective of a mother, whose son has just started kindergarten.  the son came home every day with outrageous stories of a little boy, charles.  charles was constantly in trouble.  in the end, the mother learned from the teacher that there is no charles!!  i really wish that this short story could be included in parent handbooks for every school year! so many times parents do not realize that their kids are the troublemakers.

"the seven types of ambiguity" broke my heart, since i am a book lover.  the setting of a story is a bookstore.  there was a very well-educated and well-read young man that wanted to purchase a beautiful copy of "the seven types of ambiguity."  on this visit, a man, who was less educated but rich came into the store to purchase books to start reading since he never had a chance to before.  the young man recommended books to him.  the young man left the store, and at the register, the rich man inquires about the book he was looking at.  i hoped he was purchasing it for the young man but he purchased it for himself!  i was so upset at the owner for allowing him to buy it, it was obvious the young man loved the book and the rich man was buying it for vanity purposes.  it broke my heart.  demonstrating how some seek knowledge for personal betterment and others for vanity sake's.  another story that shared this same lesson was "afternoon in linen", in which a grandmother attempted to brag about how well rounded and educated her granddaughter, was embarrassed when her granddaughter confessed to copying a poem out of a book.

the other two stories that i enjoyed touched upon racial prejudice.  the first, "after you, my dear alphonse",  was the story of a little boy johnny that brought home his friend boyd for lunch.  boyd was black and johnny's mother though trying to be kind, was extremely ignorant and racist.  she inquired about boyd's family but all of her questions are based on black stereotypes.  she asked if his father worked, he did.  she assumed he was a factory worker, but he was a foreman.  she questioned his mother not working, but then her son johnny pointed out that she didn't either!  her questions continued in this vein, she assumed he had many brothers and sister and that his family was poor.  she went so far as to try to send used clothes home with him.  boyd politely explained that he did not need them, johnny's mother then became upset for her refusing his charity.  thankfully, the boys saw her actions as being a bit "screwy".  there are two lesson in this story, one that we should believe stereotypes and secondly, our charity should be for the benefit of the individual, it should not be a means for the giver to the feel superior for helping others.

the other story "flower garden", was the story of a woman, mrs. winnings and the neighbor that moved into a house she loved.  mrs. winnings came from a well-to-do family that i would describe as uppity but a better term would be traditional.  at first, she was desperate to be the new neighbors' friend.  but after an incident in which winning's and the neighbor's son harassed a half-black child, their friendship diminishes.  the neighbor apologized for the her son's behavior and asked the boy to help her in his garden.  the boy's father did not allow him but he began to work in the garden.  since he was black, the neighbors began to shun the new neighbor when at first they were so kind to her.  the most disappointing was mrs. winnings, who completely abandoned the new neighbor due to tradition and the community's discrimination against blacks.  the story ended sadly with the new neighbor wanting to move.  though i guess to really understand how racism can destroy lives, lives must be destroyed.  again in this story, we see the destructive nature of conformity, especially in relation to upholding traditions of racism and discrimination.

these are the stories that i enjoyed the most.  not all of them are winners, for example, i was bored with "elizabeth"(though i know how it is to wake up one day and wonder how you ended up where you are in life, see: mid-life crisis), "the renegade", and "pillar of salt" (though i think this was to demonstrate how destructive new york can be.)

a good collection, i would pick it up for the stories that i mentioned and pass over the rest.


Friday, May 9, 2014

we have always lived in the castle. shirley jackson. (193)


the library book i checked out is kind of ho hum so thought i would share the over that penguin did for it recently:


eerie, right?  and perfect for the novel.

i picked up we have always lived in the castle because shirley jackson was flavorwire's author's club month selection for march.  though i feel flavorwire did a bad job of promoting the club, i never saw updates on their fb wall, i am glad they introduced this book to me.  (and yes i didn't read this until may, but in my defense, i had to wait for it from the library and then i didn't see any updates so it went lower on my to-read list.)

regardless, i am glad that flavorwire promoted this book because i would have never read it in my own.  i am not one for horror movies so horror books are not my thing either.  horror movies i don't watch partially because they are usually poorly written and the acting is normally the only truly scary thing.  however, horror books i avoid because i am scared of the ideas they will leave in my imagination.  for example i will never watch the series "american horror story" for fear that i won't be able to sleep at night.  i mean the "portlandia" skit of "american horror story" was almost too much for me.  i say i don't believe in ghost but i always freak myself out sometimes with thoughts of ghost.  so shirley jackson is definitely an author i would have overlooked.  however, i absolutely loved we have always lived in the castle, i was on the edge of my seat the entire time and became engrossed in the story.  

before i go on, i must warn you there are spoilers.  so if you have not read this book, i suggest you stop here and go read it.

we have always lived in the castle is the story of two sisters, constance and mary katherine (merricat) blackwood, that live in their family's home with their uncle julian.  the rest of their family is dead.  they live in seclusion, and as seen from merricat's weekly visits into the village, are hated by the outside world.  the reason for their seclusion is subtly and slowly revealed throughout the novel.

this novel was beautifully crafted by jackson,  it is not outright frightening but as bits and pieces are revealed in the slow build up to the climax, you are shocked and appalled by what has occurred.  the secrets of the family are cleverly revealed through a conversation with a nosy visitor.  constance, merricat, and uncle julian are the surviving members of a horrible homicide that occurred in their home.  one evening, the other members of the family, constance and merricat's father, mother, and brother and uncle julian's wife were poisoned, arsenic was put in the sugar bowl.  constance was the prime suspect but was acquitted.  

through foreshadowing, the reader knows who the culprit is though it is not said outloud until later as the climax of the work.  the pieces start to add up, merricat has this pagan/wiccan-ish view of the world, finding safety in words and turning objects into shields against evil, she is also not allowed to help with food prep, and lastly she was an unruly child that was sent to her room without supper on the night of the deaths.

though merricat is a little off, it isn't until cousin charles showed up that the reader sees what she was capable of.  the interesting thing is that though the reader knows merricat murdered her family, one is on her side during her confrontations with cousin charles.  in fact, i went ad far as wishing her to harm him.  which is kind of horrible but brilliant that jackson created this character that we know is crazy yet makes perfect sense.  does that then make me crazy?!?! 

cousin charles appeared to be a voice of reason at first but then showed his true colors brainwashing constance so he could get their money.  i was disgusted by cousin charles and glad that merricat saw through him.  i was outraged by the way he spoke of uncle julian, trying to put him in a home.  so though it was horrible that a fire was needed to rid the house of charles, i am glad it happen, though they did lose uncle julian.

in the end, the girls do find happiness.  they cut themselves off from the world, but not completely.  the village sees the error of their ways and bring the girls meals as forgiveness.  the girls also become a sort of urban legend.  to a certain extend, i wish they had ran off with their money and found happiness outside in the world, but in the end, their castle was their haven and i am glad they kept it.

we have always lived in the castle is a wonderfully written and very intriguing book.  once it gets started, i couldn't put it down.  even though i am still not one for horror, i do plan on reading more of shirley jackson's works, hopefully they don't give me nightmares.