Showing posts with label the real world. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the real world. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

a heartbreaking work of staggering genius. dave eggers. (208)



i have discussed this before but i do have hipster tendencies.  so when the huffington post listed the most hipster books of all time, and i had only read a handful of them, i decided to check them out.  i started with dave eggers' a heartbreaking work of staggering genius.

i feel horrible for saying this, especially considering it's premise, a memoir about raising a younger sibling after both parents passing away, but i hated this book.  it took everything i had to actually finish it.  ironically, i should have listened to the rules and suggestions for enjoyment of this book (which is listed at the beginning) it suggested that "the first three or four chapters are all some of you might want to bother with.  that gets you to page 109 or so, which is a nice length, a nice novella sort of length."  i thought eggers was being cheeky when in fact he was just being honest, he knew the second half wasnt' worth it. 
 

a heartbreaking work of staggering genius covers eggers' early twenties and what he encountered raising his little brother, tophe, after having lost both their parents within three months of each other.  they lost their mother to stomach cancer, and the father to what i am assumed was a heart condition  (i feel eggers really didn't share what happen to him, other than his sister finding him kneeling in the driveway one night), since he was a heavy drinker and smoker.  due to the title and the premise, i imagined myself having an emotional connection to the book having just lost my grandmother.  i was actually very hesitant about reading, worried that it would stir up too many memories and thoughts that i was not ready to revisit.  i will admit that reading about their mother is icu was difficult to read, i did cry, reminded of being in icu with my grandmother. and later in the book when eggers discussed his speaking at this mother's memorial service (their parents donated their bodies to science so there wasn't a formal burial), i understood what he went through.  i do recall when my grandmother first entered icu, i thought about what i would say at her funeral.  one feels bad for thinking such thoughts but its something that needs to be considered.  i also identified with egger's uncertainity when it came to speaking at the service.  i was the same way, wanting to share but not wanting too.  though i will add, i didn't want pity like he did but to honor my grandmother.  but that was as far as my identification and enjoyment of the book went.


my enjoyment, seriously only went up until page 109, because that is the only part that truly discussed tophe.  the rest was pretty much about the magazine, he and his friends started, which i did not find interesting at all.  to be completely honest, the only real take away i had from the remainder of the book, was that eggers wasn't casted on mtv's real world: san francisco and that puck came to do a photo shoot for them.  well not for a feature on puck but he was a model, they needed nude models for a piece about humans being the same.  but yeah that is all i really remember.  oh and i would have appreciated the innovativeness of the real world "interview" being a means of eggers discussing his childhood, but then when he had to let the cat out of the bag, recognizing that it was a made up interview to allow for this exploration, so i started to lose interest.

i really hated it.  it was seriously just about the magazine.  it could have been a work of staggering genius if he focused on the issues that he confronted while raising his brother more than whether or not he could still get laid. 


i also think that i may have missed the mark on this book.  had i read it 2000 (though i was in high school, i maybe have been to young) this would have been revolutionary.  maybe if i read it fresh out of college, i would have enjoyed it more.  i don't know what its right, i just know that it bored me.

i also want to add that i see how the book is hipstery.  i mean this is the publishing page!

its very tongue-in-cheek and clever and i would have praised it if i loved the book.  but since i did not enjoy it, i find it excessive and annoying. 



furthermore, there is the "rules" for enjoying the book that i mentioned earlier.  in addition to that there is a preface, contents page, acknowledgements (which runs for like 10 pages and includes diagrams and a random drawing of  a stapler, seriously?!?!?!) all of which i did not read because i did not want to give this book, any more time in my life.  though i will add that in the acknowledgement section, eggers says that the first 200 people that take a picture of a book and your receipt can receive a $5 check from him.  i wonder if people really did that, i would have done that and still felt robbed because the book was horrible.  you can also send it for a fictionalized version of the book on floppy disk, i might look into purchasing that if i still can.  but yeah, i can see the coolness in this, but like anything hipster, if it sucks, one does become annoyed but it.


if a heartbreaking work of staggering genius is on your to-read list, just read up to page 109.  i can tell you the story about real world and puck so you don't have to read the rest.






Tuesday, September 10, 2013

i wear the black hat: grappling with villans (real and imagined).chuckklosterman. (139)



as you may have seen in a previous klosterman post, i used to love him.  i use the word "used" because his last novel was horrible.  i thought he would redeem himself with this new book but sadly this new collection of stories added more to my dislike then my love.  

in his first book "sex, drugs, and cocoa puffs", he discussed a theory on growing up and mtv's "the real world".  if you watched "the real world" there was always a season in which the cast was horrible and you stopped watching.  klosterman's theory was that the cast wasn't bad (mtv had the same stereotypes in every season) but the viewer matured and outgrew the show.  when i read that back in the day, i had a total oh! moment, because i realized that i had in fact outgrown "the real world".  the season for me was "new york", i couldn't handle loudmouth coral, who in the past would have been one of my favorites. i did love melissa from miami. and then when vegas happened i was like what the hell is wrong with these people?  but lets be honest, 16 year old me, would have loved trishelle.  

i really hate to admit this, but i disliked this book. i guess dislike is the wrong book, i didn't offend me, and it wasn't horrible.  there were many moments where i secretly laughed or admired klosterman for his random pop culture references, but i didn't love it like i normally love his works.  his articles normally leave me with ah-ha moments were i ponder my life with a new perspesctive thanks to his article but this time i found myself disagreeing with him.  his arguments were weak and i felt like he kept on stating his opinions as fact.  for example, he wrote about kareem abdul-jabbar, being hated.  i grew up in a family where they loved him so i kept on wondering what public hated him? i mean he was on an episode of "full house", would those producers have on a hated basketball star? i mean dennis rodman was never asked to be on.  i felt klosterman constructed things to fit the scenario he needed, which i guess essayists do, but his felt far-fetch.  i can admit this change of opinion can be that i this was the first time i disagreed with him whereas with his previous books i agreed with him so saw his perspective.

another thing that rubbed me the wrong way was his hatred of the yeah yeah yeahs.  i love karen o!  he wrote:


the yyys aren't faking anything, they are that brilliant!!! (this also could have put me in the mindset to hate this book out of loyalty to the yyys.)

but anyway; this book was about evil and pretty much klosterman's attempt to show that evil people can be good and good people can be evil and that he is neither evil or good just a person.  it wasn't interesting the whole time just during parts of it.  i enjoyed his articles on clinton and his sex scandal, o.j. simpson (i didn't know he wrote a book about how he couldn't have murdered nicole only to theoretically include how he would have killed her), n.w.a., and a vigilantes.  but nothing completely enthralling, probably because there were a lot of sport references, i didn't get.  

i will add i am sad my love him is fading, i am going to go back and read "sex, drugs and coco puffs" to remind myself why i love him.  hmm, i should prolly take him off of my likes on my okcupid profile.