Showing posts with label toni morrison. Show all posts
Showing posts with label toni morrison. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

the bluest eye. toni morrison. (143)


in honor of banned books week, i decided to read "the bluest eye" by toni morrison.  it has been in the news recently because an alabama senator wanted it banned from schools because of its content, rape and incest.  some
claim the ban is a protest against common core, the new system schools are adapting to standardized education in the US.  regardless of the reason, i decided to read "the bluest eye" and see for myself.

and yes, there is rape and incest in the book.  there is also sex.  but if that is all one takes from the novel, then s/he completely missed the message and point of "the bluest eye".  in fact, by focusing only upon the rape and incest of pecola, s/he commits the same transgression that all the characters of "the bluest eye" are guilty of, making pecola a scapegoat by projecting their insecurities and self-hate upon her.

there was the physical act of pecola being raped by her father in the novel but to label it pornographic as school districts do (which i think says a lot more about administrations then students if they are aroused by it) is wrong.  the rape, and i am by no means justifying pecola's father's actions, was not one of lust but rather an extreme example of how individuals disenfranchised based on race often abuse their own race to feel empowered.  pecola's father, cholly, was "raped" by white men as a young man.  during his first time having sex, cholly and his partner were discovered by two men who had him finish while they watched. his raping of pecola was revenge for what those men did to him versus wanting to be with his daughter.  again, i am not trying to pardon on cholly, just giving the context for which the incestual rape occurred.  i want to illustrated that if the rape is contextualized for students, which it should be since it is a school lesson, then students would not see it as pornography.  furthermore, it is allows a honest discussion about sex for young adults, sex is not just an act of love or lust, it can also be abused as an exertion of control and power.  and to not go completely off based but high school kids are at the age of having sex, so reading this should not come as a complete shock to them.  they also see worse in movies or hear worse in hip hop and pop songs.  as i mentioned in my persepolis post, the topic of sex for education purposes should be find, the real issue is the topic of sex as entertainment, that is what the senator should be concerned with.

back to the novel, the bluest eye was a truly sad story.  i felt bad for pecola because all she wanted was to be love and yet the world just caused her suffering.  but as toni morrison wrote in the afterward, she did not want to "lead readers into the comfort of pitying her [but] rather than into an interrogation of themselves for the smashing."  as readers, of course we will sympathize with pecola, but morrison wanted us to stop being the forces that destroyed pecola.  as i mentioned before, pecola, being poor, black, and a female, inferior in terms of class, race and sex, she was labelled "ugly" and became a scapegoat for the characters.  instead of dealing with their own insecurities, the characters projected everything they hated about themselves upon this little girl.  but where does this self hate come from?  in the afterward, morrison explained that this was the reason for her writing the bluest eye.

its difficult because it is so ingrained into american culture but the standard of beauty is based on whiteness.  to be white is to be beautiful.  i would considered myself an intelligent and self confident woman, proud of my ethnicity but i still am ruled by this standard of white beauty because it was installed before i was so self-aware.  growing up i played with white barbies and white dolls, i watched white characters on tv and read about what characters in books, as a kid you don't really thing much of it but subconciously it has its effects.  i mean those we know me, know i hate getting too dark of a tan, it happens to me every summer, and goes away every winter, but i still try to prevent myself from becoming too dark.  i know its silly but am ruled by this need to stay light.

i think the best example of this subconscious need to be white is that as a person of mixed race often forget that i am not white.  for example, when i am out with my friends, i am always extremely critical of asian hipsters, especially foodie asian hipsters, and guess what . . . if you asked the average person to described me, s/he would say a foodie asian hipsters.  i mean my friends would too but never to my face. (hipster in my opinion is a misnomer.)   where does this hate for foodie asian hipsters come from?  i think it had to do with my thinking i am a unique individual and then having to be confronted with the fact that i actually am a stereotype, i do fit into the box that society wants to label me.  but i do take pictures of what i eat, and shop at urban outfitters and hold up peace signs in pictures.  it horrible to realize that you are stereotypical but better to accept yourself then trying to avoid a label.  

this denial of nature to avoid labeling was best exemplified by geraldine, the mother of the demonic little boy who blamed pecola for killing the cat.  in the section about geraldine, there is a discussion about colored folks versus n****** (prior to reading this always thought chris rock was clever for his blacks versus n*****, but looks like morrison beat him to the punch(line)). geraldine is so determined to not be labelled a n*****, that she denied the essence that makes her black, she denies who she is.  her denial and self-loathing, is then exploded upon pecola, someone she wrongly viewed by her eyes as a n*****.  if geraldine accepted herself and not tried to live up to society's standards, she would not have wasted so negative energy on hating her own race.

another example of this race on race hate  stemmed by a white standard of beauty was the children making fun of pecola for being black.  the irony is that all of the kids were black and yet they singled her out as being the "blackest".  as morrison explained that it was the worse insult because one does not have control over their skin color.  she went on to explain, "it was their own contempt for their blackness that gave the first insult its teeth."  to be told you are worthless or ugly because of your skin color, something you have no control over, fills a person with self-hate.  since you have no control over the matter and you are denial about yourself loathing, you focus on someone like you and project your feelings on them.  unfortunately, it results in you hating your own race/ethnicity.

i wish i could say that we have professed in terms of accepting all races and ethnicities as beauty however we haven't.  we see beautiful people of all ethnicities and races in our media today but they are still treated as an exception versus the rule.  i wish i could say that hopefully times will change but i am pretty sure it won't.  i mean i am aware of the unacceptance of racial beauty yet i still promote it.  it is going to take alot to change the definition of beauty.  so it's important that we don't banned books like the the bluest eye to based on its mislabeling as pornographic and connection to unpopular educational systems.




Sunday, May 19, 2013

beloved. toni morrison. (111)


i read toni morrison's "beloved" because it is on flavorpill's 30 before 30 list.  i have to admit, at first i was weary because of the ghost and supernatural occurances in 124.  i am not one for ghost stories but it turned out to be a tragic yet beautiful story of endurance. 

"beloved" is the tale of a family and community coping with a tragedy and the appearance of a mystery woman.  the tragic event was when slaveowners found escaped slave sethe (the protagonist) to return her to the farm and in an attempt to keep her children safe, she kills her infant daughter.  sethe is jailed and the slaveowner frightened by the sight leaves her alone.  this infant daughter haunts her house and the community and then comes back in the form of an actual person, beloved.  

infanticide is a horrible crime yet is justifiable considering the horrors of slavery.  i might sound like a horrible person but i understand why sethe killed her baby.  better for that baby to die at the hands of her mother than later in life by her slaveowner or the clan.  also better to avoid a life of abuse and treatment like an animal.  actually as demonstrated in paul d's (an old friend of sethe who becomes her lover) story about how he was jealous of a rooster when he realized it was more free than him.  its horrible to imagine any situation in which a human is treated less than an animal but sadly this was how the american institution of slavery was.

in my post for art spiegelman's "maus", i discussed how "maus" allows readers to truly understand a part of history that one would only know due to history books but not as a human experience.  the same can be said for "beloved".  in school, we learn about slavery yet we have have no idea what it was really like.  in history books there are excerpts from slave narratives but unless you read one it's can not grasp the full experience of a slave.  furthermore, i would assume american textbooks present slaveflaw oils not be complete honesty about slavery and present it in a sympathetic light because american society would not want its student to see its country negatively.  to get a honest perspective one has to look elsewhere. "beloved" allows the reader to do just that, it puts things into perspective.  

for example, i knew that slaves were separated from their family members; families torn apart because they were viewed as property but it was different when i read about it in "beloved".  reading about baby suggs, sethe's mother-in-law, trying to find out which farms her children were taken to or how paul d was  amazed and envious when he met generations of black families that were able to stay together, framed it in a ways i could relate.  but the best example was paul d thought that sethe love for her daughter denver was "risky":

for a used-to-be-slave woman to love anything that much is dangerous . . . the best thing, he knew, was to love just a little bit; everything, just a bit, so when they broke it back, or shoved it in a croaker sack, well, maybe you'd have a little love left over for the next one.

it sad to imagine a world in which affection and love for your child was
dangerous because at any moment they could be taken away from you.  and yes all parents fear losing a child but for slaves it was a fact of life. furthermore, imagine your family bonds not being respected because you were not viewed as a person.  family relations were ignored because slaves were not viewed as having them because they were property.

another aspect of "beloved" that left an impression on me was the hopelessness of slavery and how individuals coped with it.  all the characters had to deal with it but i believe baby suggs was the best example because she was free and yet did not find happiness.  her son, sethe's husband, had bought her freedom but even than it did not result in peace for her. baby suggs was a spiritual leader but after the tragedy with sethe, her spirit was broken.  like she told her friend stamp when he asked why she didn't preach anymore and accused her of punishing god, she replied "not like He punish me".  it's hard to believe in a god that does not stop the suffering in one's life.  i have always said that i could never be job so i undertstand baby sugg's frustration with god.  as a result of her hopelessness, baby suggs went to bed and stayed there, her "wish was to consider what in the world was harmless" and she did that by thinking about colors because they never harmed anyone.  it was sad but beautiful how she found comfort in colors, she still had hope even if she didn't have faith in god.

another example of this hopelessness was the chain gang that paul d worked on.  it was explained that the gang would sing as they worked:

singing love songs to Mr. Death, they smashed his head.  more than the rest, they killed the flirt whom folks called Life for leading them on.  making them think the next sunrise would be worth it . . .

morrison's analogy of life as a flirt is quite clever though sad.  it's one thing to not have faith in god but quite another to not have faith in life.  

though "beloved" demonstrated the horrors of slavery, the lesson to be learn is to not hold on to the past.  (this is also the same lesson of "the great gatsby" which is also on the 30 before 30 list. hmmmm).  as explained before, sethe's dead daughter comes back to life as beloved and at first sethe is happy because it gives her the opportunity to right her wrong.  however, even though sethe wa regretful and tried to give beloved the love she needed, in the end, beloved destroyed her.  and that is how it is in life, if you cling to the past it will ruin you (like seen in "gatsby").  instead one must accept their past, mistakes and all, and continue to life on.  one can not let tragedy stop them.  an individual must learn to endure the pain that life can be at times.

i wonder if this is the one of the overall lesson of the flavorpill list?  so far two books about not holding onto the past.  but regardless, "beloved" was a wonderful novel and should be read regardless of your age.